Is Increasing Profits the Only Social Responsibility of Business Assignment

Is Increasing Profits the Only Social Responsibility of Business - naming ExampleIt will also give my sound judgement as to whether businesses have more to do socially than make profits.As the author of the exact letter points out, both views are relevant in their ingest right. However, I disagree with an aspect pointed out by Friedman because he contradicts himself. This is when he says that the only social obligation of businesses is to increase profits provided they are within the law and also without fraud and deception. He further goes on to say that it is not a business responsibility to avoid pollution, abolish discrimination and provide troth (Friedman, 1970). That is a very irresponsible statement from Friedman because committing the three acts he has highlighted is not within the law for a business. Being an artificial person does not absolve a business from its responsibilities to the fiat in which it operates.Conversely, my opinion is that Porter and Kramer are rat ional in what they believe businesses should do to society. They provide that it is not prudent for businesses to throw off the welfare of the society which forms their customers and suppliers. Letting the environment degrade by, for example, not avoiding pollution, as suggested by Friedman, depletes natural resources critical to businesses and the society (Porter & Kramer, 2011). I also agree with Porter and Kramer that although businesses need to take the initiative to bring society and themselves back together, they are stuck in thoughts that social responsibility is not at the core of business alone at the periphery. I believe it is in the best interest of businesses to be surrounded by a healthy society, and they should consider society as a key resource to their businesses. The idea of shared time value may be costly for businesses to initiate and implement, but once in place, it will be reciprocally profitable to them and society and generations that are yet to come (Porte r & Kramer, 2011).In conclusion, businesses, and Friedman, must